A colleague of mine was telling me today that Newsweek had once run a story about how the greatest indication of whether or not a person was going to be successful later in life had little to do with their actual letter grades in high school or college. Instead, it was more directly related the the level of coursework and the ability to complete it with any amount of success. Basically, he'd rather his children take advanced placement coursework and earn a C on the report card than take the "dumbed down" class and earn an A. This is what he said the article, written in a time Newsweek wouldn't include psycho-babble nonsense instead. Why can't people realize that we're losing old fashioned value of hard work ethic in this country?
What are we telling students who don't even want to maintain a C average in their "dumbed down" coursework if we push them through to the next grade level? I think we're telling them they're doing enough and smart enough to compete in a society. I think we're lying to them indirectly and ruining their chances as positive influences in today's marketplace. Social norms are going to slap them in the face because teachers and schools can't kick them in the pants. Professional teachers have been told for years that it would just be too much for the child to endure if they were held back a grade level. What is that all about? Why can't a student who doesn't make the grade be held back any longer? Why should Johnny, (I know, Johnny gets a bad name when we refer to him so often for ANYTHING) be advanced to the next grade level if he chooses to clam up and not complete school work? Why should he be told it's ok?
I know why he is told he can move to the 7th grade. It's societal guilt. People think, "Johnny's parents are divorced," or "Johnny is bigger than the rest of his class already," or "Johnny's motivation will fall desperately out of control and he'll drop out at 16." Well, I think that while all those things might be true or possible, we cannot change the rules or set the bar even lower for a student who doesn't perform. If the difference is he completes high school and "earns" his degree because teachers have just let him slide through, how's that going to help him be better off in the marketplace than he would be if he chooses to drop out because he repeated 6th grade? So he hasn't been motivated since 6th grade and he tests at maybe a 7th grade reading level, how is that different than just pushing him through the system and out the door with a degree he didn't earn?
Well, it's up for debate I'm sure. I just am about fed up with our school system that is searching for so many options and spending so much money on technology and motivational activities each and every day and all we need is to retain a few kids who are nothing more than lazy bums. Retain a few of them, and they'll prove to be more influential in our society in the future by helping motivate their peers who don't want to be in their shoes. Maybe it will even motivate them to start using their God given talents that they are squandering in the first place. If they don't change after that, call a paramedic because they are dead in the water. If they are moved through the system, call the police, because teachers have assassinated them.
Randy--You definitely make some valid, albeit frustrating points! As a personal note to add to those thoughts, I work in a ninth grade center where, even at the parents request (!!), students are denied from repeating the year in instances where they did not pass any of the classes. To me, this sets them up for failure more than the possible humiliation that we think (think being the operative word) they may experience by repeating the classes that they have to take anyway in order to graduate. How many seniors are going to be willing to take a freshmen English, sophomore Science and all of their other classes along with summer school every summer until they graduate?
ReplyDeleteIt seems that some facets of education has become an issue of how many times/ways we can get the kids on the front of the newspaper doing something "FUN" as opposed to how well are we preparing these students for work force, college, etc.
Great points Randy!!
WOW! Wonderful arguements and a great way for you to 'let it out!' Our school no longer even THINKS about retention because of the harm it will do to the child in the long run. And who says this....our special ed teacher. So as a staff we believe her and string a handful of kids along and hope for the best. As a staff, we do argue the point of retaining and how it could be a positive thing for a student verses a negative thing. Our principal isn't too keen on retention as well, due to funding and 'how it looks!'
ReplyDeleteSometimes changes isn't so good....like you said...it worked before, why not now? Make these kids feel self worth and accountability again. Good blog!
Great topic! I bet your fingers were burning after typing with so much fury. Here is another story to fuel the fire. The students in our town that have been kicked out of school can go to A.E. So we have to pay a whole new set of administration, teachers, building fees, and such to tailor to these students. I just heard that a student recently got kicked out of their. He is getting tutored by a substitute 1 hour a day who is getting paid through the school district.
ReplyDeleteWe need to cut the cord. This kid needs to figure it out or let his parents pay for it. If our fore fathers knew that all there struggle for free education ended up like this, whew boy!!!!
Good topic, if someone wants to make the choice to slack off, he needs the consequences as well.
Philip